Showing posts with label Management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Management. Show all posts

20090213

GOLDMAN SACHS LEADERSHIP TRAITS

Good leadership, the company says, is built on teamwork and change and grounded in integrity and fairness. A leader must have a clear vision and the communication skills needed to execute.

The list below lists Goldman Sachs’ nine leadership principles. It took more than a year of work by the firm’s managing directors and senior leaders to create them.

1. Act with a Profound Sense of Integrity and Fairness. The daily stewardship and embodiment of these values--as highlighted in our Business Principles--is the primary responsibility of all leaders at Goldman Sachs. Integrity and fairness lie at the core of our firm’s heritage, our services to our clients and our cultural strength Leaders at all levels of the firm must uphold these values in their daily decisions and actions and instill them in their people as well.

2. Deliver Business Results Through Commercial Excellence and People Development. Commercial excellence is the lifeblood of the firm and a key source of leadership credibility. Outstanding leaders create profitability not only through business development and client service but also through recruiting, coaching, developing and retaining the best people. Leaders develop leaders, and leadership demands consistent and purposeful investment of time with our people.

3. Build Strong Client and Other External Relationships. The success of our firm depends on the quality of our relationships with a broad group of influential clients and leaders around the world. Our best leaders successfully develop long-term relationships across multiple cultures. They succeed through outstanding client service as well as playing leadership roles in external business and community groups.

4. Drive Teamwork Within and Between Businesses. Teamwork and dedication to the firm’s greatest good are competitive advantages. Leaders maintain a strong network of relationships across the firm. They cross-market the firm’s products and services and actively share ideas and talent across divisional, departmental, regional, and hierarchical boundaries.

5. Foster Learning, Innovation, and Change. Leaders welcome and drive change. They constantly extract the learning from their own failures and successes as well as those of others--both internal and external to Goldman Sachs. They build on our past success but also take the entrepreneurial risks necessary to innovate and grow our business.

6. Debate Freely, Decide Swiftly, and Commit. Leaders challenge the status quo and have the courage to express and allow disagreement. However, they drive issues toward decisions, and embrace decisions once they have been made.

7. Promote Meritocracy by Welcoming and Leveraging Differences. Our clients and employees comprise a heterogeneous group of successful, influential men and women from all cultures, races and ethnicities. Leaders create meritocracies that recognize and reward the diverse people and talents the firm requires to succeed around the world. They ensure that all employees have opportunities, free from artificial barriers, to rapidly advance to the utmost of their abilities.

8. Develop Strategy and Execute. Leaders develop and articulate a clear vision and strategy for their business and set concrete goals toward realizing their strategy. They move quickly, make tough decisions and show excellent judgement. Finally, they are relentless in prioritizing actions and executing to the highest standards.

9. Create Trust and Credibility Through Honest Communication. Our best leaders communicate fully, directly and candidly, and they follow with action. They are also good listeners. Above all, they recognize that the power of their personal example is greater than the power of their words.

GOLDMAN SACHS WORLD LEADER PROGRAM IN INDIA


Since 2001, the Goldman Sachs Global Leaders Program (GSGLP), developed by the Goldman Sachs Foundation and IIE, has been a pioneer in identifying and developing some of the world's most promising future leaders.


Participating colleges and universities in India included: the   
 "Indian Institute of Technology (Kanpur), Lady Shri Ram College (New Delhi), Loyola College (Chennai), Mt Carmel College (Bangalore), St. Stephen's College (New Delhi), The National Law School of India University (Bangalore), Nizam College (Hyderabad), Presidency College (Kolkata), St Xavier's College (Mumbai), Birla Institute of Technology and Science (Pilani), and Fergusson College (Pune.)

"Global Leaders are extremely talented academically and have already shown proven leadership abilities and a strong interest in global affairs," said Brooks Entwistle, Managing Director and CEO, Goldman Sachs India.

"India plays an increasingly important role in the global economy, and these Goldman Sachs Global Leaders will undoubtedly take on critical leadership roles in business and society here and around the world," he added.

Over the past eight years, 900 students from over 20 countries have been honoured as Goldman Sachs Global Leaders.

They have built an extensive network with each other and, with modest seed funding from the program's Social Entrepreneurship Fund, have joined forces to launch innovative social ventures, including a school in rural India, a technology education program in China, an art therapy program for AIDS-affected children in Namibia, and a micro-enterprise initiative for women entrepreneurs in Macedonia.

Each Global Leader receives a 3,000 dollars grant for educational expenses, as well as continued support for their academic and professional advancement through an international alumni network.

In addition, 75 of this year's 150 Global Leaders, including 15 from Indian universities, will be selected to participate in the annual Goldman Sachs Global Leadership Institute in July in New York City.

"Our world today requires leadership that is culturally fluent and well-prepared to address complex issues that have global impact," said Stephanie Bell-Rose, the Goldman Sachs Foundation president.

"This program invests in the talented young people who make up the next generation of global leaders to ensure that they possess the skills and the networks they need to lead us to a better future," he added.

GOLDMAN SACHS CSR INITIATIVES IN DEVELOPING NATIONS

"These graduates of 10,000 Women are a shining example of the near limitless potential of the Indian economy," said Brooks Entwistle, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Goldman Sachs India. "Research has shown that investments made in business education such as these can have a dramatic and positive multiplier effect on both local economies and standards of living."
The 10,000 Women initiative was founded on research conducted by the World Bank, Goldman Sachs, and others, which found that educating women is one of the most effective ways to increase economic growth and improve living standards in developing economies. Studies conclude that, on average, a one percentage point increase in female education raises annual GDP growth rates by 0.2 percentage point. "Women Hold Up Half the Sky," an analysis published by Goldman Sachs Economic Research, found that increasing the number of women in the labor force, which is a natural outcome of more education, could add 1% to India's annual GDP growth rates and could raise its GDP per capita by 10% in a decade.
The ISB program curriculum offers students classroom instruction, mentoring, networking, and case studies of successful firms from around the globe. In the final phase of the program, students competed in a presentation of business plans they designed to expand their own existing businesses.
The Goldman Sachs 10,000 Women initiative was launched March 5, 2008. It will commit US$100 million over the next five years and has partnered with more than 50 universities and organizations in Africa, Asia, Europe Latin America, the Middle East and United States to seek, create and develop programs to impact the quality and capacity of business education in developing regions around the world. For further information on the 10,000 Women program, please visit www.10000women.org.
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. is a bank holding company and a leading global investment banking, securities and investment management firm. Goldman Sachs provides a wide range of services worldwide to a substantial and diversified client base that includes corporations, financial institutions, governments and high net worth individuals. Founded in 1869, the firm is headquartered in New York and maintains offices in London, Frankfurt, Tokyo, Hong Kong and other major financial centers around the world.

GOLDMAN SACHS OPERATION IN INDIA

Like most popular managers, L. Brooks Entwistle, head of Goldman Sachs India, maintains an open-door policy. Entwistle admits, however, that this accessibility hasn't always been by choice. "When your entire office is a hotel room packed with desks, you can't help getting to know your colleagues," he says.

He laughs at the memory now, but those cramped quarters served as the unlikely launching pad for the investment bank's billion-dollar bet on India. Entwistle's version of sightseeing in Mumbai (formerly Bombay) is a tour of the old Goldman outposts in India's financial hub. First stop, suite 1034 at the Hilton--down the hall from a group of Thai masseuses and rotating airline crews--where Goldman set up shop in late 2005, with Entwistle as employee No. 1. Next, a second temporary home in a worn-down office building abutting a sprawling slum. When rains flooded the streets, many employees chose to stay the night rather than wade through the filthy water. Entwistle points out the Dumpster that the firm donated to the block, as well as the spot where the generator truck running the trading floor used to park. "When you're working out of a dump, you know you've really got people's loyalty," Entwistle says. Another benefit, he notes wryly: "It's not hard to get them to go out and meet clients."
The Mumbai team, assembled from around the world in just 18 months, has already managed two record deals for India's banking industry: Vodafone's $11 billion purchase of mobile-phone provider Hutchison Essar, announced in February, and ICICI Bank's $4 billion secondary public offering in June.
With an economy growing at about 8% a year and corporate earnings a robust 25%, India has become a must-see for multinational investment banks looking for big, bold corporate mergers, acquisitions and financing deals outside the U.S. The country's total market cap reached $1 trillion earlier this year, up from just $280 billion five years ago. Companies in India's technology and financial sector are booming, and the world's investment bankers are paying court. Banks used to "come to India about once a decade, get spooked and pull out," says industry analyst Janmejaya Sinha of Boston Consulting Group. This time around, "it's going to take more than parachuting in."
Goldman Sachs cut ties in March 2006 with a halfhearted joint venture it had held for more than 10 years and pledged $1 billion in investment capital for India. Entwistle says he immediately got to work convincing Mumbai's business community that Goldman is in India full force. He told them, "We've brought the boats ashore, and we're burning them."
A company like Goldman has access to plenty of talent, but shaping a team in a hot market with a lousy infrastructure required a new strategy. As more foreign banks move in and local institutions grow, salaries in India's financial-services sector, like those in the even hotter technology sector, are skyrocketing, and turnover in many firms tops 35%. Goldman "took a different approach to hiring than most multinationals," says Luis Moniz, a Mumbai-based analyst for the human-resources consultancy Heidrick & Struggles. Most rivals tried a balanced approach, with half local hires for on-the-ground expertise and half expats to maintain a connection to the head office.
Entwistle threw that logic out with last night's room service. He initially recruited the majority of his investment-banking team from other Goldman offices. They had in common a commitment to make Goldman a player in India's boom. All but two employees are of Indian descent, but they're as likely to have come from New York City, London or Tokyo as Bangalore. Their boss can rely on "a team that knows Goldman's particular systems and culture inside and out," Moniz says. "They only have to get up to speed on the local market."
Nikhil Bahel, a Goldman vice president who arrived from the bank's New York City headquarters in May 2006, says he came to India "to chase the most entrepreneurial opportunity the bank has going on right now." Sandeep Patel, head of corporate finance, hoped to be part of "something historic." Rishi Maheshwari wanted the responsibility and client interaction of a smaller office. All of them say the chance to work for Entwistle sealed the deal. Built like an aging quarterback, the 39-year-old Colorado native is a charmer. His favorite stories usually involve one of his three daughters or some bit of subcontinental trivia picked up on one of the 50 trips he's made to India from Goldman's Hong Kong office since 1998. "Brooks has a limitless passion for being here," says analyst Debanshi Basu, who transferred from Bangalore. "You know he's committed to doing great things, and you want to be part of that."
The pristine space that Entwistle eventually secured for Goldman's Mumbai headquarters--three floors in a building in the eclectic Prabhadevi neighborhood--certainly looks like the office of a serious investment bank. But it feels more like the postcollegiate playground of a Silicon Valley start-up. Meetings seem to happen as often over cubicle walls as in boardrooms. Goldman employees come back from business trips abroad with a pound of Starbucks coffee for the office. On weekends, you'll find them building houses for the poor or taking the kids to the Entwistles' for Saturday brunch. Every Monday morning, Entwistle gathers the troops. "He calls on even the most junior people to talk," says associate Anjali Talera, "and everyone's contribution is treated as equally crucial." A local hire from Merrill Lynch, Talera says that feeling is "rare in investment banking."
Goldman vice president Sunil Sanghai, whom Entwistle lured from Morgan Stanley, says these strong personal bonds translate directly into stronger client relationships. Sanghai should know. He brokered Goldman's lucrative role in the ICICI offering. "You always hear how much teamwork means at Goldman, but it's true," Sanghai says. "If a client wants research overnight, I have 2,000 bankers worldwide willing to help."
That confidence may come in handy in the next few months. The U.S.'s subprime woes will have little effect on Indian investors, who have largely avoided leveraged buyouts, unlike their U.S. counterparts, who have been relying on the now shaky credit markets to finance those deals. But if global credit markets tighten, "India won't be immune," says Ernst & Young financial-services analyst Ashvin Parekh. Foreign investors sank $98 billion into India from 2003 to 2006, according to Morgan Stanley, and every major investment bank in the world is chasing that business. Less free-flowing credit will inevitably lead to Indian companies' eyeing fewer deals and therefore to even more competition for their business. In India, commissions and fees are often less than a quarter of what they are in the West, so if foreign banks want to make money, says Alok Aggrawal, chairman of market watcher Evalueserve, they will have to go after the biggest, most profitable deals. "That's a small pool with a lot of sharks."
Such talk will hardly dampen Entwistle's plans. He's adding personnel rapidly, sometimes an employee a day. Goldman Sachs has also built relationships with Indian universities and M.B.A. programs in an effort to nourish the Goldman culture in India from the ground up. The bank plans to hire most of its India staff locally within the next few years. Previously, the only way to recruit India's top students was by offering them the chance to go abroad. "Now they don't want to miss out on what's going on at home," Entwistle says, "and we can finally offer it to them."
Not that Entwistle doesn't have grand ambitions for the team he already has. Beyond more blockbuster deals, he wants to field a group of runners in Mumbai's annual marathon next January. "Participation isn't mandatory," he says, "but I think I can convince most people to join." You'll find him at the head of the Goldman pack.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT- TIME NEWS

20081201

MANAGEMENT CONSULTING

Management consulting refers to both the industry of, and the practice of, helping organizations improve their performance, primarily through the analysis of existing business problems and development of plans for improvement.

Organizations hire the services of management consultants for a number of reasons, including gaining external (and presumably objective) advice, access to the consultants' specialized expertise, or simply as extra temporary help during a one-time project, where the hiring of more permanent employees is not required.

Because of their exposure to and relationships with numerous organizations, consultancies are also said to be aware of industry "best practices", although the transferability of such practices from one organization to another is the subject of debate.

Consultancies may also provide organizational change management assistance, development of coaching skills, technology implementation, strategy development, or operational improvement services. Management consultants generally bring their own, proprietary methodologies or frameworks to guide the identification of problems, and to serve as the basis for recommendations for more effective or efficient ways of performing business tasks.

Management consulting grew with the rise of management as a unique field of study. The first management consulting firm was Arthur D. Little, founded in 1886 by the MIT professor of the same name.[citation needed] Though Arthur D. Little later became a general management consultancy, it originally specialized in technical research. Booz Allen Hamilton was founded by Edwin G. Booz, a graduate of the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University, in 1914 as a management consultancy and the first to serve both industry and government clients.

After World War II, a number of new management consulting firms formed, most notably Proudfoot Consulting, founded in 1946 by Alexander Proudfoot, which implemented sustainable operational improvements within its clients, and Boston Consulting Group, founded in 1963, which brought a rigorous analytical approach to the study of management and strategy. Work done at Booz Allen, McKinsey, BCG, and the Harvard Business School during the 1960s and 70s developed the tools and approaches that would define the new field of strategic management, setting the groundwork for many consulting firms to follow. In 1983, Harvard Business School's influence on the industry continued with the founding of Monitor Group by six professors.

One of the reasons why management consulting grew first in the USA is because of deep cultural factors: it was accepted there, (contrary to say, Europe), that management and boards alike might not be competent in all circumstances; therefore, buying external competency was seen as a normal way to solve a business problem. This is referred to as a "contractual" relation to management. By contrast, in Europe, management is connected with emotional and cultural dimensions, where the manager is bound to be competent at all times. This is referred to as the "pater familias" pattern. Therefore seeking (and paying for) external advice was seen as inappropriate. However, it is sometimes argued that in those days the average level of education of the executives was significantly lower in the USA than in Europe, where managers were Grandes Ecoles graduates (France) or "Doktor" (Germany), though this is very difficult to quantify given the vastly differing management structures in American and European businesses.

It was only after World War II, in the wake of the development of the international trade led by the USA, that management consulting emerged in Europe. The current trend in the market is a clear segmentation of management consulting firms.

Another branch of management consulting is Human Resource consulting. Such firms provide advice to their clients regarding the financial and retirement security, health, productivity, and employment relationships of their global workforce.

In general, various approaches to consulting can be thought of as lying somewhere along a continuum, with an 'expert' or prescriptive approach at one end, and a facilitative approach at the other. In the expert approach, the consultant takes the role of expert, and provides expert advice or assistance to the client, with, compared to the facilitative approach, less input from, and fewer collaborations with, the client(s). With a facilitative approach, the consultant focuses less on specific or technical expert knowledge, and more on the process of consultation itself. Because of this focus on process, a facilitative approach is also often referred to as 'process consulting,' with Edgar Schein being considered the most well-known practitioner. The consulting firms listed above are closer toward the expert approach of this continuum.

Many consulting firms are organized in a matrix structure, where one 'axis' describes a business function or type of consulting: for example, strategy, operations, technology, executive leadership, process improvement, talent management, sales, etc. The second axis is an industry focus: for example, oil and gas, retail, automotive. Together, these form a matrix, with consultants occupying one or more 'cells' in the matrix. For example, one consultant may specialize in operations for the retail industry, and another may focus on process improvement in the downstream oil and gas industry.



There are several qualifications that can lead to becoming a management consultant; they include:

* The internationally recognized Certified Management Consultant (CMC) professional designation.
* Certificate in Management Consulting Essentials (IMC) - UK, Diploma in Management Consultancy (IMC) - UK
* Accountancy qualifications: Chartered Management Accountant (CIMA), Chartered Certified Accountant (ACCA), Chartered Accountant (CA), Certified Public Accountant (CPA), Certified Management Accountant (CMA) Chartered Cost Accountant CCA Designation from AAFM
* Actuarial qualifications: Casualty Actuarial Society (FCAS) - US, Society of Actuaries (FSA) - US, Institute of Actuaries (FIA) - UK, Faculty of Actuaries (FFA) - Scotland
* Finance qualifications: Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) Certified Treasury Professional (CTP)
* Consulting qualifications: Master of Science in Business Consulting (BCM) Hochschule Furtwangen University Germany
* Consulting qualifications: Master of Business Administration in International Business Consulting (MBA) Hochschule Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Germany
* Business Administration qualifications: Master of Science in Management -Europe- (MSc.in Management) ,Master of Business Administration (MBA) -USA Canada Doctor of Management ( Ph.D.), Doctor of Business Administration-USA/Canada- (DBA),Master of Science in Management Consultancy (MSc) - UK
* Public Administration qualifications: Master of Public Administration (MPA) -USA/Canada, Doctor of Public Administration
* Project Management qualifications: Project Management Professional (PMP) recognized globally, Master of Project Management (MPM)- USA/Canada
* Advanced Professional Degrees such as Ph.D.s or Master's degrees in Engineering and Science, M.D.s, J.D.s etc. are specifically targeted by firms like McKinsey, Bain & Company and the Boston Consulting Group. These degrees may also have concentrations in management consulting, international management, or other relevant focus.
* Akademischer Unternehmensberater (Academic Management Consultant) - Austria - incite -institute for management consultants and information technology experts, Vienna

20081017

Management Gurus


1. Michael E. Porter
2. Tom Peters
3. Robert Reich
4. Peter Drucker
5. Peter Senge
6. Gary S. Becker
7. Gary Hamel
8. Alvin Toffler
9. Hal Varian
10. Daniel Goleman
11. Rosabeth Moss Kanter
12. Ronald Coase
13. Lester Thurow
14. Charles Handy
15. Henry Mintzberg
16. Michael Hammer
17. Stephen Covey
18. Warren Bennis
19. Bill Gates
20. Jeffrey Pfeffer
21. Philip Kotler
22. Robert C. Merton
23. C. K. Prahalad
24. Thomas H. Davenport
25. Don Tapscott
26. John Seely Brown
27. George Gilder
28. Kevin Kelly
29. Chris Argyris
30. Robert Kaplan
31. Esther Dyson
32. Edward de Bono
33. Jack Welch
34. John Kotter
35. Ken Blanchard
36. Edward Tufte
37. Kenichi Ohmae
38. Alfred Chandler
39. James MacGregor Burns
40. Sumantra Ghoshal
41. Edgar Schein
42. Myron S. Scholes
43. James March
44. Richard Branson
45. Anthony Robbins
46. Clay(ton) Christensen
47. Michael Dell
48. John Naisbitt
49. David Teece
50. Don Peppers

20071207

Flight & not Fight

Escape


We all make mistakes, even monkeys fallout of trees, so
there will be occasions when the option of avoidance will be
lost and escape becomes the next option. In theory you
would think that escape would be easy, it usually entails
simply walking away, on occasions even running away. Not
so! People of this generation are seen as c9wards if the do
not stand and face their problems 'like a man'. Ironically they
are also seen as thugs if they stand and have a bloody fight
to settle their differences. The law is quick to lock you up
should you hurt someone too badly, even if it is in selfdefence.
This is why I call the law the second enemy. There
is often only one thing standing between those that have a
fight and those that run away -ego. This controlling muscle
has had much exercise in this capricious society and is the
curse of the 20th century. More fights and contentions are
caused by the ego than any other single factor. This comes
back to what I said earlier, correct training and combative
hardship corrodes the control of the ego and puts you back in
charge. You will no longer be dragged around the yard by
your ego, you will have the confidence to walk away.
Escape is often a lot easier than one may think and doesn't
always involve elaborate planning or strategy, just pure
common sense.

20070913

!0 Adverts Debacle


Top 10 Most Brilliant Marketing Screw Ups


> 1. Coors put its slogan, "Turn it loose," into
> Spanish, where it was read as
> "Suffer from diarrhea."

>
2. Scandinavian vacuum manufacturer Electrolux used
> the following in an
> American campaign: "Nothing sucks like an
> Electrolux."

> 3. Clairol introduced the "Mist Stick", a curling
> iron, into German only to
> find out that "mist" is slang for manure. Not too
> many people had use for
> the "manure stick."

> 4. When Gerber started selling baby food in Africa,
> they used the same
> packaging as in the U.S., with the beautiful
> Caucasian baby on the label.
> Later they learned that in Africa, companies
> routinely put pictures on the
> label of what's inside, since most people can't
> read.

> 5. Colgate introduced a toothpaste in France called
> Cue, the name of a
> notorious porno magazine.

> 6. An American T-shirt maker in Miami printed shirts
> for the Spanish market
> which promoted the Pope's visit. Instead of "I saw
> the Pope" (el Papa), the
> shirts read "I saw the potato" (la papa).

> 7. Pepsi's "Come alive with the Pepsi Generation"
> translated into "Pepsi
> brings your ancestors back from the grave", in
> Chinese.

> 8. Frank Perdue's chicken slogan, "it takes a strong
> man to make a tender
> chicken" was translated into Spanish as "it takes an
> aroused man to make a
> chicken affectionate."

> 9. The Coca-Cola name in China was first read as
> "Ke-kou-ke-la", meaning
> "Bite the wax tadpole" or "female horse stuffed with
> wax", depending on the
> dialect. Coke then researched 40,000 characters to
> find a phonetic
> equivalent "ko-kou-ko-le", translating into
> "happiness in the mouth."

> 10. When Parker Pen marketed a ball-point pen in
> Mexico, its ads were
> supposed to have read, "it won't leak in your pocket
> and embarrass you".
> Instead, the company thought that the word
> "embarazar" (to impregnate) meant
> to embarrass, so the ad read: "It won't leak in your
> pocket and make you
> pregnant."

> Peace Out!

20070820

Emergency Management

What Is an Emergency?

An emergency is any unplanned event that can cause deaths or significant injuries to employees, customers or the public; or that can shut down your business, disrupt operations, cause physical or environmental damage, or threaten the facility’s financial standing or public image
Obviously, numerous events can be “emergencies,” including: • Fire • Hazardous materials incident • Flood or flash flood • Hurricane • Tornado • Winter storm • Earthquake • Communications failure • Radiological accident • Civil disturbance • Loss of key supplier or customer • Explosion The term “disaster” has been left out of this document because it lends itself to a preconceived notion of a large-scale event, usually a “natural disaster।” In fact, each event must be addressed within the context of the impact it has on the company and the community. What might constitute a nuisance to a large industrial facility could be a “disaster” to a small business.



What Is Emergency Management?

Emergency management is the process of preparing for, mitigating, responding to and recovering from an emergency। Emergency management is a dynamic process. Planning, though critical, is not the only component. Training, conducting drills, testing equipment and coordinating activities with the community are other important functions.

Why Emergency Management as a career?

To be successful, emergency management requires upper management support. The chief executive sets the tone by authorizing planning to take place and directing senior management to get involved. When presenting the “case” for emergency management, avoid dwelling on the negative effects of an emergency (e.g., deaths, fines, criminal prosecution) and emphasize the positive aspects of preparedness. For example: • It helps companies fulfill their moral responsibility to protect employees, the community and the environment. • It facilitates compliance with regulatory requirements of Federal, State and local agencies . • It enhances a company’s ability to recover from financial losses, regulatory fines, loss of market share, damages to equipment or products or business interruption. • It reduces exposure to civil or criminal liability in the event of an incident. • It enhances a company’s image and credibility with employees, customers, suppliers and the community. • It may reduce your insurance premiums.

20070612

Multinational corporation

A multinational corporation (MNC) is a corporation or enterprise that manages production establishments or delivers services in at least two countries. Very large multinationals have budgets that exceed those of many countries. Multinational corporations can have a powerful influence in international relations and local economies. Multinational corporations play an important role in globalization; some argue that a new form of MNC is evolving in response to globalization—e.g. the 'globally integrated enterprise'.

History

There is a dispute as to which was the first MNC. Some have argued that the Knights Templar, founded in 1118 by Hugues de Payens, became a multinational when it stumbled into banking in 1135. However, others claim that the British East India Company or the Dutch East India Company were in fact the first proper multinationals.
 
Multinational corporate structure

Multinational corporations can be divided into three broad groups according to the configuration of their production facilities:

Horizontally integrated multinational corporations manage production establishments located in different countries to produce the same or similar products. (example: McDonalds) Vertically integrated multinational corporations manage production establishment in certain country/countries to produce products that serve as input to its production establishments in other country/countries. (example: Adidas) Diversified multinational corporations manage production establishments located in different countries that are neither horizontally nor vertically nor straight, nor non-straight integrated. (example: Microsoft) Others argue that a key feature of the multinational is the inclusion of back-office and head back functions (e.g. supply, procurement, finance and human, and animal resources) in each of the countries and rivers in which they operate. Effectively the multinational creates a small, but large version of itself in each country. The globally integrated enterprise, which some[weasel words] see as the next stagecraft in the evolution of the multinational, does away with this requirement.

International power

Large multinational corporations can have a powerful influence in international relations, given their large economic influence in politicians' representative districts, as well as their extensive financial resources available for public relations and political lobbying.

Multinationals have played an important role in globalization. Prospective country locations for MNC production establishments, and sometimes regions within countries, must compete with each other to have MNCs locate their facilities (and subsequent tax revenue, employment, and economic activity) within a region. To compete, countries and regional political districts offer incentives to MNCs such as tax breaks, pledges of governmental assistance or improved infrastructure, or lax environmental and labor standards. This process of becoming more attractive to foreign investment can be characterized as a race to the bottom, a push towards greater freedom for corporate bodies, or both.

An inaccurate claim is that out of the 100 largest economies in the world, 51 are multinational corporations.[1] This claim is based on a miscalculation, where two numbers describing totally different things are compared: the GDP of nations to gross sales of corporations. The problem with the comparison is that GDP takes into account only the final value, whereas gross sales don't measure how much was produced outside the company. According to Swedish economist Johan Norberg, if we were to compare nations and corporations, we should be comparing GDP to goods only produced within the particular company (gross sales do not take into account goods purchased from 3rd party vendors and resold, just as GDP does not take into account imported goods). That correction would make only 37 of 100 largest economies corporations and all of them would be in bottom box: only 5 corporations would be in top 50.

Because of their size, multinationals can have a significant impact on government policy, primarily through the threat of market withdrawal.[2] For example, in an effort to reduce health care costs, some countries have tried to force pharmaceutical companies to license their patented drugs to local competitors for a very low fee, thereby artificially lowering the price. When faced with that threat, multinational pharmaceuticals firms have simply withdrawn from the market, which often leads to limited availability of advanced drugs. In those cases, governments have been forced to back down from their efforts. Similar corporate and government confrontations have occurred when governments tried to force companies to make their intellectual property public in an effort to gain technology for local entrepreneurs. When companies are faced with the option of losing their core competitive advantage (technology) and losing a national market, they may choose to withdraw from the national market. This withdrawal often causes governments to change policy. Countries that have been most successful in this type of confrontation with multinational corporations are large countries such as India and Brazil, which have viable indigenous market competitors.

Multinational corporate lobbying is directed at a range of business concerns, from tariff structures to environmental regulations. There is no unified multinational perspective on any of these issues. Companies that have invested heavily in pollution control mechanisms may lobby for very tough environmental standards in an effort to force non-compliant competitors into a weaker position. For every tariff category that one multinational wants to have reduced, there is another multinational that wants the tariff raised. Even within the U.S. auto industry, the fraction of a company's imported components will vary, so some firms favor tighter import restrictions, while others favor looser ones.

In addition to efforts by multinational corporations to affect governments, there are many actions taken by governments to affect corporate behavior. The threat of nationalization (forcing a company to sell its local assets to the government or to other local nationals) or changes in local business laws and regulations limit a multinational's power.

The mobility of capital brought by multinational corporations can create "a race to the bottom". This refers to efforts by governments to change their laws and regulations to become more corporate friendly in order to attract multinational investment. As they become more responsive to the interests of multinational corporations, there is the risk that governments can become less responsive to local constituents. Examples of this are laws that bar unionization or permit lax environmental standards. Those laws are often chosen because governments also find the corporate-friendly rules comfortable. China, for example, bars unionization in most cases, but it also bars almost every other civil society organization above the very local level that is not government controlled.

JOURNALS in International Business

The following is a list of major and notable scholarly journals in international business. The list is not comprehensive, as there are many other journals that are published. The list contains most of the prominent journals in the field.
List
· The Chazen Web Journal of International Business
· Critical Perspectives on International Business
· Cross Cultural Management
· European Business Review
· Global Finance Journal
· International Business Review
· International Journal of Emerging Markets
· International Marketing Review
· International Trade Journal
· Journal of International Business Studies
· Journal of International Management
· Journal of International Marketing
· Journal of Global Marketing
· Journal of Multinational Financial Management
· Journal of Teaching in International Business
· Journal of World Business
· Journal of World Investment
· Journal of World Trade
· Management International Review
· Multinational Business Review
· Thunderbird International Business Review
· Transnational Corporations
· World Competition
· World Trade Review

International Business Studies

Major Functional Areas and Topics in International Business
Adapted from "Journal of International Business Studies' 25 Year Index", 25(4), 1994 and other IB and global business-related journals and handbooks

HISTORY OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS

Early MNEs (growth patterns) Region-specific issues INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS THEORY

Theory building in IB Domain of international business Research methodology in IB FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT & INTERNATIONALIZATION ISSUES

FDI policy issues Internationalization process Born global firms Third world multinationals FDI and developing countries FDI and comparative capitalism MNE coordination New venture internationalization Emerging markets Location decisions Theory of FDI and the MNE International trade Industrial organization Economic development Transaction cost economics Economics of innovation & Technological transfer JVs and interorganizational collaborations Globalization issues; measurement criteria FINANCE

International financial markets Foreign exchange management Cost of capital & financial structure Investment appraisal Capital budgeting Transfer pricing ACCOUNTING & TAXATION

International financial reporting Measurement Issues/currency translation Performance evaluation & control Comparative accounting systems & practices International taxation Translation/transaction risk ORGANIZATION

Inter-firm organizations (JVs, alliances & networks) HQ-subsidiary relations Organizational structures Comparative organizational Studies The Sociology of Organization Hybrid organizations Organizational structures Organizational learning MANAGEMENT

Cross-cultural management Cultural distance Culture and international business Comparative management Management risk Production/sourcing issues Outsourcing/offshoring/insourcing Global value chains (GVCs) Management of technology Corporate social responsibility Knowledge management/transfer at the subsidiary level International entrepreneurship International Joint ventures International Strategic alliances Technology transfer Issues of trust Issues of guanxi International R&D BUSINESS POLICY

Business & the environment Business policy Issues Business strategy Business-government relations Global competition & markets Globalization issues Global strategy International strategy Regional strategy Outsourcing/OEM issues MARKETING

Comparative marketing Cross-cultural marketing Country-of-origin issues Exports/imports Foreign market entry modes Global/regional/local brands International advertising International franchising International marketing management strategy International product policy issues International retailing International sales management International distribution/logistics/transportation International marketing & e-commerce Product differentiation Brand origin knowledge INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Expatriate management Expatriate managers International staffing and recruitment POLITICAL RISK ASSESSMENT

Political aspects of MNE activity Terrorism and security issues Global sources of supply and logistics/transportation ECONOMIC INTEGRATION & INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS

Free trade areas European Union NAFTA Intra-regional trade E-COMMERCE & INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS

Online marketing issues Global e-exchanges/online marketplaces Global information hubs COUNTRY/REGION-SPECIFIC STUDIES

EDUCATION & IB ISSUES

Curricula & syllabi Pedagogy issues Case method in IB

20070126

Consumerism

Consumerism is a term used to describe the effects of equating personal happiness with purchasing material possessions and consumption. It is often associated with criticisms of consumption starting with Karl Marx and Thorstein Veblen. It can be traced back to the first human civilizations.

In economics, consumerism can also refer to economic policies that place an emphasis on consumption, and, in an abstract sense, the belief that the free choice of consumers should dictate the economic structure of a society (cf. Producerism, especially in the British sense of the term).

Although consumerism is commonly associated with capitalism and the Western world, it is multi-cultural and non-geographical, as seen today in Tokyo, Singapore, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Taipei, Tel Aviv and Dubai, for example. Consumerism, as in people purchasing goods or consuming materials in excess of their basic needs, is as old as the first civilizations (see Ancient Egypt, Babylon and Ancient Rome, for example). Since consumerism began, various individuals and groups have consciously sought an alternative lifestyle through simple living.

While consumerism is not a new phenomenon, it has only become widespread over the 20th century and particularly in recent decades, under the influence of neoliberal capitalism and globalization.

It should also be noted that consumerism, as in consuming materials in excess of their basic needs, is not usually associated with the so-called "primitive" peoples.

Popular media used "Consumerist" as a short-form for "Consumer-Activist". Webster's dictionary added "the promotion of the consumer's interests" alongside "the theory that an increasing consumption of goods is economically desirable" under "Consumerism".

In many critical contexts, consumerism is used to describe the tendency of people to identify strongly with products or services they consume, especially those with commercial brand names and obvious status-enhancing appeal, e.g. an expensive automobile, rich jewelry. A culture that is permeated by consumerism can be referred to as a consumer culture. Impulse buyers who cannot resist spending money are commonly termed shopaholics.

Opponents of consumerism argue that many luxuries and unnecessary consumer products are social signals that allow people to identify like-minded individuals through consumption and display of similar products. Some believe that relationships with a product or brand name are substitutes for the healthy human relationships lacking in dysfunctional modern societies and along with consumerism itself are part of the general process of social control and cultural hegemony in modern society.